About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors
Dean Barker
Laura Clawson
Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
Katrina Swett
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Dodd Defends Constitution, Sununu Defends Doing Nothing

by: Dean Barker

Thu Oct 18, 2007 at 19:21:15 PM EDT


Sometimes, a serendipitously timed contrast in leadership among our public servants can be breathtaking.  Today is one of those days, and it revolves around your telephone.

Tycoon telecoms like Verizon (and, boy, are they not exactly our friend right now in NH) and AT&T may or may not have been helping the President spy on your conversations without a warrant.  You read that right, and no, you are not in North Korea.

And what's the only thing worse than enabling a power-hungry White House in its quest to rend the constitution?  Refusing to tell Congress whether they were involved or not.  Apparently, the folks you pay through the nose every month to talk on the phone think that they are as above the law as the "Decider" himself.

Oh, but it gets worse still.  Congress' bill to "fix" the spying provisions may even grant retroactive immunity to the telecoms for their possible crimes.  Did I mention yet that this concerns the US, and not North Korea?

Chris Dodd 'aint having it.  He is taking the somewhat extraordinary step of putting a hold on this bill (and unlike Republicans, he's not concealing the fact that he's the one placing the hold):

Saying telephone companies had enabled an assault on the U.S. Constitution, Dodd announced in an email to supporters that he has placed a "hold" on a wiretapping bill reportedly including such immunity.

..."I said that I would do everything I could to stop this bill from passing, and I have," Dodd said.

Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del., who is also vying for the Democratic nomination for president, said in a statement Thursday afternoon "if they violated the law they should be held accountable."

Other Democratic presidential candidates, including Sens. Hillary Clinton, D- N.Y., and Barack Obama, D-Ill., hadn't returned a request for comment.

This is leadership.  This is defending our Constitution.  And this is exactly why I support Chris Dodd for President.

Senator* Sununu, on the other hand, likes to talk about his "maverick" ways on civil liberties.  He ignores Gonzales' taste for torture while voting to confirm him, then parades his call for removing him, though doing nothing materially to remove him.

Speaking of telephones, here is where Sununu's leadership lies.  John E. attended a recent Senate committee hearing on the increasingly shady and abusive practices of cell phone carriers, including deceptive billing and fess, lousy service, and this from - surprise! - Verizon and AT&T:

Verizon recently prevented NARAL Pro-Choice America from sending text messages to its supporters, and in August, AT&T censored the webcast of a Pearl Jam concert after lead singer Eddie Vedder criticized President Bush. Both actions provoked fury from free speech advocates.
How did Civil Liberty John E., representing the Live Free or Die State, respond?
John Sununu of New Hampshire, said he did not see anything in the cell phone companies' practices that would "warrant significant intervention in the marketplace."
Warrantless spying? Censorship? Shady business practices?  If it doesn't affect unfettered, unregulated capitalism, our Senator* just isn't interested.
Dean Barker :: Dodd Defends Constitution, Sununu Defends Doing Nothing
Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Sentimental Senator* Sununu (4.00 / 1)
Those (sniff) telephone company refusals to carry content that the Administration doesn't like - it brings back such warm memories (sniff).

Phone jamming, thinks John E. They're playing our song.


Ha! So obvious, yet I missed it. (0.00 / 0)
He does have an affinity for phone shenanigans, doesn't he?

birch, finch, beech

[ Parent ]
Just Hang Up (0.00 / 0)
Sununu. Telephones. Dangerous combo.

[ Parent ]
Great Post (4.00 / 1)
Great post Dean, thanks for writing about Dodd's actions today. I'm glad that this heartens your support for Dodd for President.

.::Hold Fast::.

Give Dodd some love (0.00 / 0)
Here's a link to express your gratitude for his leadership.
http://www.democrats...

...the Doo Dah Man once told me you've got to play your hand. Sometimes the cards ain't worth a dime if you don't lay 'em down.

Sorry, wrong link (4.00 / 1)
Should be
http://action.chrisd...

...the Doo Dah Man once told me you've got to play your hand. Sometimes the cards ain't worth a dime if you don't lay 'em down.

[ Parent ]
Another great reason to support Chirs Dodd: (0.00 / 0)
DODD CAMPAIGN TO HOLD DAY OF ACTION TO END THE WAR IN IRAQ
With Special Guest Senator Chris Dodd and Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter

MANCHESTER - Presidential candidate and U.S. Senator Chris Dodd will hold an End the War Day of Action in his Manchester campaign headquarters on Saturday, October 20th.  Senator Dodd and New Hampshire Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter will speak to participants and urge them to spend the day pressuring President Bush to end the war in Iraq .

Local supporters, activists, and all concerned citizens are invited to join the Dodd campaign on Saturday for a series of activities to express their support to end the war in Iraq .  Activities will include contacting the White House, going to door to door in Manchester , signing a petition to President Bush demanding the withdrawal of U.S troops, and end the war visibilities throughout Manchester . The event will also be live-blogged at ChrisDodd.com.

The event is free and open to the public.

Saturday, October 20, 2007

11:30 AM  End the War Day of Action
With Senator Chris Dodd and Congresswoman Carol Shea-Porter
  Location: Chris Dodd for President Headquarters
  379 Elm Street
  Manchester , NH


Cool. You have me musing (0.00 / 0)
on a Shea-Porter endorsement.

That would be as breakthrough a moment as anything, imho.

birch, finch, beech


[ Parent ]
It's not just your phone calls. (0.00 / 0)
As we now know, privatization has been a major strategy for removing public issues from the public arena for the simple purpose of making sure that the public (the pesky people to whom the Constitution assigns the power to govern) don't actually have a say in what's being done in their name.

I mean, we know by now that cheaper, better, more responsive government wasn't really the  goal.  If it had been, don't you think that in such a great talented country it would have been achieved by now?

If you'll recall, it was when Howard Dean announced an intent to reregulate the corporate media monopolies that they lowered the boom, so to speak.  We all thought it was on the entertainment side, because that's where the assault came from, but they're just part of the communications empires. Regulation, in case you missed it, means public supervision and accountability.  Accountability means making someone tell what they know for the simple reason that they agreed to do so when they took the job.  (Does that make the efforts to make foreign detainees talk ironic, or what?)

Also worth remembering is that the internet we are all now using was developed at the behest of the Department of Defense.  Somehow, it escaped from the university-based super computers into the world wide web.  And we know, that there's still an interest in what has been wrought and trying to re-capture it, from none other than Bush Two, who added that extra 's' in talking about the internets.  What was unclear was whether the DoD would go ahead and set up a parallel system that the public wouldn't be able to access or commandeer the commercial network that already encircles the globe.  I guess we now know that it's the latter.  Besides, the proprietary protections enjoyed by private corporations are better guarantors of secrecy than government bureaucrats, whose loyalty might be to the American people, rather than the bottom line.

Have our representatives in Congress been complicit in this strategy of evading the limits of the Constitution in order to dominate the world?  You bet.  Just as they've been complicit in taking over some vital real estate in Iraq for the purpose of setting up the necessary communications monitoring systems that will surveil that side of the globe.  That's why we're paying for it through the nose.

The telecom companies are happy to be involved, but they don't want to go to jail.  You see, when the agents of government don't follow the law, all they risk is being dismissed, unless they've also done something criminal--i.e. to benefit themselves materially; the individual or corporate person can do a whole host of things that government bureaucrats can't, but if they break the law, it's a crime and they are liable to be fined and/or go to jail.

The wars of the future will be fought in cyberspace

Our leaders' goal is to dominate the globe.  It will, of course, be a benevolent dictatorship.  Everyone who obeys the laws we impose will be free.


NARAL won that one (0.00 / 0)
Verizon reversed itself on the NARAL thing, but it took a public fight. NARAL mobilized quite effectively.

I bought Verizon's explanation (0.00 / 0)
They claimed that they had a policy that said some mass messages could be blocked. It was intended (they claim) to let them block porn sent to kids. But some overzealous lower-level employee applied used it to block NARAL's messaging.

[ Parent ]
I'm inclined to believe that too (4.00 / 1)
My point was just that NARAL mounted an effective campaign against it. That could have languished for months.

[ Parent ]
Good for Dodd (4.00 / 1)
There seem to be a few places I can put this, so I might as well put it here.

All this reinforces the importance of standing on principle. I can see the Republican argument, in a way -- the government rushes in, panicked, and says "Give us your records." The phone company complies, then gets sued later. Seems unfair.

I mean, Qwest was the big hero of the whole thing, right? Not really -- according to NPR, Qwest was willing to hand over the records but said, in effect, we'll do it if you get a warrant. So the government ran off, not bothering to get a warrant.

Messy business -- maybe a judge would cut Verizon and AT&T some slack. But to write that slack into law, to say, "It's OK because we said it was OK" is just wrong.

You can compromise on almost anything in politics, except principle.



Dodd prepared to filibuster this bill (0.00 / 0)
Just got a note in my email that said that in the strongest terms.

Why isn't the media covering this? When was the last time any presidential candidate pledged to  filibuster a bill his opponents were being quiet on?



Sen. Obama's Statement (0.00 / 0)
Just so we're on the record -- as reported on last night's TPM Election Central:
"I have consistently opposed this Administration's efforts to use debates about our national security to expand its own power, whether that was on the Iraq war, or on its power grab to curb our civil liberties through domestic surveillance programs. It is time to restore oversight and accountability in the FISA program, and this proposal -- with an unprecedented grant of retroactive immunity -- is not the place to start."

Tim Foley
Proud to be a New Hampshire staff member for Barack Obama's movement for change.


[ Parent ]
Sorry to be dense (0.00 / 0)
but, how does one (much less the Bush Administrations) use a debate, or debates about national security, to "expand its own power"?

[ Parent ]
Fair enough, (4.00 / 1)
I appreciate the statement. But when this bill comes to the floor, it's Dodd that will have to take a week of camoaigning off to stop it:

Whenever that big day comes, Dodd -- as the keeper of the "hold" -- must return from the campaign trail to officially block debate on the bill. That entails standing around on the Senate floor, forcing procedural votes, avoiding the furious glares of colleagues who don't share the same concerns. The standard duration of such showdowns is about a week -- time that Dodd, who is trailing badly in early primary polls, can scarcely afford.

Can't we all as Democrats split that burden?

Better yet -- if Obama and Hillary pledged to filibuster, the filibuster would likely not happen, and compromise could be reached.



[ Parent ]

Connect with BH
     
Powered by: SoapBlox