About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors
Dean Barker
Laura Clawson
Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe
William Tucker

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Bank Slate
Betsy Devine
birch, finch, beech
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Miscellany Blue
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce
Tomorrow's Progressives

Politicos & Punditry
The Burt Cohen Show
John Gregg
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Primary Wire
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
Ann McLane Kuster
Katrina Swett
Jennifer Daler

ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

NYT: The Edwards kids are trapped on the bus

by: mbair

Sat Aug 25, 2007 at 21:34:23 PM EDT




cross-posted at dailykos

I just read the most absurd column in the New York Times. I don't know if you got a chance to read it yet, but it comes across in a real clear way that the author, JODI KANTOR, thinks that the Edwards are bad parents.

I know that's the most ridiculous thing you've heard about Edwards recently, a high threshold to meet, but check out the language. It's not even remotely subtle.

In 2008 Race, Little Ones Go on the Trail With Daddy

DES MOINES ? Emma Claire and Jack Edwards, 9 and 7, were on their umpteenth campaign trip earlier this month, this time through small towns where their father was decrying rural poverty and the power of lobbyists.

mbair :: NYT: The Edwards kids are trapped on the bus
The two children barely listened. They scampered away from speeches as fast as their parents would allow...

"I don?t want to do this," Jack protested to his father, John Edwards, the Democratic presidential candidate and former North Carolina senator.

"I don?t care whether you want to do this," Mr. Edwards replied.

A moment later, Jack hid his face in his hands.

"Mr. Jack, do we need to go in the back and have a conversation?" asked Mr. Edwards, lifting his son?s head.

The boy sat for a few more minutes, fidgety but obedient, before being freed and happily bounding with his sister to the fort they were building in the back of the bus.


The author then goes on a longish and fairish rant about certain candidates and their choices around campaigning and parenting, except for this little dagger:
Mr. Edwards and Mr. Obama represent poles of the debate ? Mr. Edwards has upended his children?s lives for the campaign while Mr. Obama is determined to keep his daughters rooted at home with their routines intact ? while the others fall somewhere in between.

The train starts to pull into the station right about here:
Mr. Edwards, who lost his oldest son in a car accident 11 years ago, is determined to avoid regrets like the one Mr. Brownback described, even if it means dragging Emma Claire and Jack through thousands of miles and stump speeches.

The author mentions that the kids won't be able to spend time in their "28,000-square-foot pleasure palace," and that Elizabeth Edwards "hatched this plan" to have them traveling with their parents as much as possible and then comes this incredibly bleak image:
instead of their routine of school, sports and friends, they will travel with their parents, spending days on buses and nights at Comfort Inns...

To hear the couple talk, it will be an enriching, madcap adventure that will allow their children to learn things on the road they might not in a classroom, and it will fulfill their highest priority: being together.


To hear the couple talk?

WTF, people.

Traveling together, though, does not always mean being together. On a recent Iowa trip, Mr. and Mrs. Edwards were busy with voters, interviews and phone calls, and the children spent good chunks of the day in the care of their baby sitter.

It is a familiar life for them. When Mr. Edwards was the Democratic vice presidential nominee in 2004, Jack spent Halloween walking the aisles of a campaign plane in a Mighty Morphin Power Ranger costume, collecting candy from the press corps. This fall, his parents say, he will be sorry to miss playing on his sports teams at home. Asked what she would miss, Emma Claire sounded alarmed.

"How will I get to see my dog?" she asked.

WTF, Jodi.

No sports, no dog, no "pleasure palace," no routine of friends, arts and crafts and all the joys of childhood for the kids as long as their parents are running. No the kids can look forward to being uprooted, upended and dragged all over the country to boring speeches, fleeing to vending machines, the fort in the back of the bus, the occasional trampoline and a whole lot of time without their parents in a Comfort Inn.

Is it me? The language is absurd and I think it's incredibly offensive that the author would write so negatively about the Edwards's choice for their family during this campaign. I think one of the joys of childhood is spending some time with your parents doing something really cool. Traveling around the country running for president with your Mom and Dad sounds pretty cool to me even if the trail can be a grind. And I think we can all agree that those kids want to be with their parents as much as possible, the songbook notwithstanding. Good for them. Happy Travels.

John and Elizabeth Edwards will be on Face the Nation Tomorrow morning. Tune in to see them for yourself.

Tags: , , , , , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email
Let me suggest that this interpretation is flawed. (4.00 / 1)
Better you should go read the original.
While the NYT reporter clearly indicated that what the boy was objecting to was being interviewed, the editing here creates the impression that Edwards is being an authoritarian and punitive.
There are some inconsistencies in the NYT story in the supposed dichotomy between the Obama and Edwards reliance on their children for campaign props, but it's my sense that the reporter got an assignment (story outline) which she tried to fill in.

The title of this post is, however, most unfortunate.  Being "trapped on the bus" is not something millions of Americans want to be reminded of and it's not the theme of the NYT story.


In Concord (0.00 / 0)
as Cate blogged at www.johnedarwds.com/nh, the kids listened to their dad for while while he spoke, then ran off to play.
I'd rather them be along, than left with a nanny. Its a journey that may get them crabby at times, like all kids on a road trip(been there done that), but they will remember it for a lifetime. We sat 20 feet from Elizabeth who was in the shade of the bus at White Park. We never heard any crying or fussing. Just the usual kid on a hot day being instructed by their mom, while they tried to run wild. You can't help but feel love for this family and the commitment they have to changing America. Ms Kantor, bug off.

Next time, there may be no next time.

[ Parent ]
I read it differently (0.00 / 0)
It is clear from the language chosen that this author doesn't like what the Edwardses are doing with their kids. And I also encourage anyone reading to check the full article and decided for themselves because I forgot one of the best parts in the diary. This part, after the author accuses most politicians of using their kids like "little Ed McMahon's" she writes this:
The Edwards children are the most visible of all the candidates?, pictured on the first frame of their father?s Web site and often seen standing with their parents at the start of events. Last week, when they filed into a deserted ice cream parlor in Perry, Iowa, their orders were recorded by five photographers and four reporters.

Asked about the scrutiny, Mr. Edwards said his children were used to it, while Mrs. Edwards said she was watching for signs of anything amiss.

And again as I said in the diary, the article is hard on everyone. It's a very tough choice and certainly not a Plan A to travel with your kids on the road as part of your job whomever you happen to be, but the language is unfair towards the Edwardses specifically and the balance is non-existent when it comes to their story. Obama gets taken to task, Dodd too and others, but the low opinion that this writer has for the Edwards family will come across as clear as a bell to you if you read the whole thing.


[ Parent ]
I agree with Hannah (0.00 / 0)
The writer may in fact object to kids being taken on the campaign trail, but in general I think John and Eliabeth Edwards come off well here.

But that said, everybody who runs for president disrupts the lives of everyone close to them. Remember Judith Steinberg Dean, and how she didn't want to get involved? Didn't last long, did it? When my mother ran locally, I distinctly remember coming home from college and being handed envelopes to stuff before anyone said hello. (I survived, I'm not looking for pity.) And that was a LOCAL election.

Did you catch the detail about four reporters recording the kids' ice cream order? That's a sample of what a presidential campaign is like.

Years from now, who knows, they might treasure the memory. Whoever wins is going to see their kids a lot less.


[ Parent ]

Connect with BH
     
Powered by: SoapBlox