About
Learn More about our progressive online community for the Granite State.

Create an account today (it's free and easy) and get started!
Menu

Make a New Account

Username:

Password:



Forget your username or password?


Search




Advanced Search


The Masthead
Managing Editors
Dean Barker
Laura Clawson
Jennifer Daler

Contributing Writers
elwood
Mike Hoefer
susanthe

ActBlue Hampshire

The Roll, Etc.
Prog Blogs, Orgs & Alumni
Betsy Devine
Blue News Tribune (MA)
Democracy for NH
Live Free or Die
Mike Caulfield
Granite State Progress
Seacoast for Change
Susan the Bruce

Politicos & Punditry
Krauss
Landrigan
Lawson
Pindell
Primary Monitor
Scala
Schoenberg
Spiliotes
Welch

Campaigns, Et Alia.
Paul Hodes
Carol Shea-Porter
John DeJoie
Ann McLane Kuster
ActBlue Hampshire
NHDP
DCCC
DSCC
DNC

National
Balloon Juice
billmon
Congress Matters
DailyKos
Digby
Hold Fast
Eschaton
FiveThirtyEight
MyDD
The Next Hurrah
Open Left
Senate Guru
Swing State Project
Talking Points Memo

50 State Blog Network
Alabama
Arizona
California
Colorado
Connecticut
Delaware
Florida
Georgia
Idaho
Illinois
Indiana
Iowa
Kentucky
Louisiana
Maine
Maryland
Massachusetts
Michigan
Minnesota
Missouri
Missouri
Montana
Nebraska
Nevada
New Hampshire
New Jersey
New Mexico
New York
New York
North Carolina
North Dakota
Ohio
Ohio
Oklahoma
Oregon
Pennsylvania
Rhode Island
South Dakota
Tennessee
Texas
Texas
Utah
Vermont
Virginia
Washington
West Virginia
Wisconsin

Daniel Webster Strikes Back

by: Dean Barker

Thu Jul 02, 2009 at 20:14:00 PM EDT


Looks like "overwhelmingly negative feedback" forced the Division of Parks and Recreation to hit the re-do button:
In a statement, (Commissioner of Resources and Economic Development George) Bald said: "Based on substantial public feedback, I have decided to withdraw the first draft of the Division of Parks and Recreation's Ten-Year Strategic Plan. There was an impression in this draft plan that a potential strategy would be to divest ourselves of properties. This was never the intent of this methodology. The Division, in cooperation with the State Park Systems Advisory Council, will present a more comprehensive draft plan that makes that clear."

"The state park system is an integral component of what makes New Hampshire special for its residents and visitors. It is critical that we take the time now to be strategic in our thinking to ensure that these wonderful assets are available for our children and grandchildren to enjoy well into the future."

I have an idea for the upcoming draft plan: have the state of New Hampshire help to fund our state parks, much as the other 49 states do.

But that might require confronting Meldrim's Ghost sooner than later, so heck if I know how to fix this in the short-term.

I'd also like to give a little shout-out to the UL on discovering the original draft and bringing it to wider attention.  Their conservative bias aside, this is precisely what makes statewide news outlets valuable.

Dean Barker :: Daniel Webster Strikes Back
Tags: , (All Tags)
Print Friendly View Send As Email

Is there something wrong with majority rules?
Connect with BH
     
Powered by: SoapBlox