Governor Lynch Vetoes HB 1679

Governor Lynch has just vetoed HB 1679, a bill that would outlaw “partial birth abortion.” This is a rather transparent attempt to gin up the forced incubation advocates, given that federal law already outlaws this non-existent medical procedure. Governor Lynch’s statement here.

I say non-existent, because if you were to look in a medical book (one that contains actual SCIENCE), you would not ever find mention of such a procedure. The term was created by the fetus fetishizing terrorists to use to gin up their followers. The proper term for a termination in the last trimester is late-term abortion.  
As you can see in the comment section at the Union Leader the crowd is swilling down the gin already.

These are the same (male) commenters who are also in favor of eliminating food stamps and TANF – who see no hypocrisy in their position of wanting to force women to incubate. They’d also rather the woman die than have a late term abortion to save her life.

No woman has a late term abortion for any reason other than medical necessity. The mostly male, anti-abortion crowd refuses to recognize that, preferring to portray women who go through hell making this decision as being inconvenienced by pregnancy.

The bottom line is – a woman doesn’t get to the third trimester by accident, or negligence. A woman who reaches her third trimester wants to have a baby.

After Dr. George Tiller was murdered terrorist Scott Roeder, a number of his patients shared their stories about the agonizing decision they made to have a late term abortion. They’re deeply personal and deeply sad.

So, thank you, Governor Lynch. This was an entirely unnecessary bill, put forth by Freebaglicans who are so unfit to run our legislature that they chose to abdicate their promised focus on jobs and the economy in order to focus on throwing red meat to their witless constituents.  

, , ,

4 Responses to Governor Lynch Vetoes HB 1679

  1. Kathy Sullivan 2 June 16, 2012 at 5:10 am #

    Thanks for posting this, Susan.

    As Gov. Lynch’s term winds down, a veto like this again shows what a good governor we have had for the last 7 1/2 years.    

    • mevansnh June 16, 2012 at 5:54 pm #

      it will be time to push Lynch into running against Ayotte in 2016, and hopefully he’d accept the challenge and win.

  2. Timmy J June 16, 2012 at 9:22 pm #

    Furthermore, a “late-term” abortion is something created by male physicians and not physiologic at all.  A woman is either pregnant or she’s not.  It doesn’t matter how far along she is, and an abortion in month 9 is no different than an abortion in week 4.  We make it different because we apply random “terms” to a pregnancy.

    If a woman’s health in in jeopardy, then she she be allowed to terminate the pregnancy regardless of the “term” it happens to occur in.

    I’m glad Gov Lynch vetoed this bill – it’s what is best for women across this state.

    • Lucy Edwards June 16, 2012 at 11:55 pm #

      and leave the decisions up to the woman and her medical providers.  TRUST WOMEN.  Instead we are letting them pick away at our right to bodily integrity.  

Site maintenance and hosting by Hoeferweb